Dirty chat bot

While tech giants like Facebook, Google and Apple are keen to build the by Silicon Valley, academic researchers and the business community in the area of artificial intelligence, driven by powerful chips, fast networks and access to massive amounts of data about how people lead their digital lives.That's showing up in everything from sorting photos on Facebook to beating Go champions and diagnosing medical conditions.But current chat bots aren't capable of much complexity.Their state of the art is to do simple tasks like book a restaurant or have short conversations of limited scope.The research has boosted performance in using various negotiation tactics, like being able to negotiate until there's a successful outcome, propose more final deals and produce novel sentences.The agents even started pretending to be interested in an item so they could later concede it as if it were a compromise.Each agent had different priorities and each item carried a different value for each agent.

In one example, dialog agents were tasked with dividing up a collection of items like five books, three hats and two balls.

Humans had a chance to try out the agents, and the researchers said the people couldn't tell they were chatting with bots.

Other fly-by-night Eve Mining Bots ask their users to disable the UAC (User Account Control) in order to even work!

The ability to think ahead is crucial and with the introduction of something called dialog rollouts, which simulate future conversations, the bots were able to do so.

Or as FAIR scientist Mike Lewis put it: "If I say this, you might say that, and then I'll say something else." Lewis said those rollouts are the key innovation in this project.

Search for Dirty chat bot:

Dirty chat bot-59

FAIR didn't delve too far into what applications might be appropriate for bot-bargaining or whether this capability will surface in any Facebook products.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

One thought on “Dirty chat bot”

  1. Students will record the number of M&Ms that are still "radioactive" (M side up) in their data table after each run, and set aside the "stable" (M side down) M&Ms.